28. Introduction to Digital Forensics
28.3 Types of Forensics
| Type | What it examines | Example question |
|---|---|---|
| Disk forensics | Hard drives, SSDs, USBs, files (even deleted) | What files existed, when were they made/deleted? |
| Memory forensics | RAM contents (a memory dump) | What was running? Any password or malware in memory? |
| Network forensics | Captured traffic, logs (Chapter 24) | Where did data go? What connected out? |
| Mobile forensics | Phones and tablets | Calls, messages, app data, location |
Deleted files are often recoverable: deleting usually removes only the pointer, not the data, until it is overwritten. Forensic tools "carve" files back from the raw disk. Memory forensics (tools like Volatility) can find things that never touch the disk – exactly why Meterpreter (Chapter 23) is dangerous but still detectable in RAM.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip
"If I delete a file, it's gone" is a misconception – even after emptying the recycle bin, the data stays on the disk until something else is written over that space. So when selling or throwing away a disk with sensitive data, don't just delete – do a secure wipe. This is a practical lesson for students.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – मराठी
"File delete केली म्हणजे गेली" हा गैरसमज आहे – recycle bin रिकामा केला तरी data disk वर राहतो जोपर्यंत त्या जागेवर दुसरे काही लिहिले जात नाही. म्हणून sensitive disk विकताना किंवा फेकताना नुसते delete नको, secure wipe करा. हा students साठी practical धडा आहे.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – हिंदी
"File delete की मतलब चली गई" यह गलतफ़हमी है – recycle bin खाली करने के बाद भी data disk पर रहता है जब तक उस जगह पर कुछ और नहीं लिखा जाता. इसलिए sensitive disk बेचते या फेंकते समय सिर्फ़ delete नहीं, secure wipe करो. यह students के लिए practical सबक है.
Practice task
Match each to its type: recovering a deleted photo from a pen drive; finding malware in a RAM dump; tracing where stolen data was uploaded. Write the forensic type for each.
Extended teaching notes
Why this lesson matters
Use this lesson to strengthen systems you own: understand the risk, practise safely in a lab, then write and apply the fix.
Apply the fix across stacks
Same class of bug, same idea in every language.
Java / Spring Boot
Parameterise queries, encode output, CSRF tokens, limited Actuator, dependency scanning.
ASP.NET Core
EF Core / parameterised SQL, Razor encoding, HTTPS, Data Protection.
Node.js / Express
helmet, parameterised SQL, npm audit, avoid eval and shell concat.
Python / Django / Flask / FastAPI
ORM, autoescape, pip-audit, Bandit; never shell=True with user input.
PHP / Laravel
PDO/Eloquent, Blade escaping, composer audit.
Go / Ruby
database/sql placeholders / ActiveRecord; html/template / ERB escaping; govulncheck / Brakeman.
nginx / Apache / Tomcat
Hide versions, TLS, security headers, least-open ports.
MySQL / PostgreSQL / MongoDB / Redis
Private networks, auth on, least-privilege users, no 0.0.0.0/0.
AWS / Azure / GCP
Roles not long-lived keys, private data stores, cloud audit logs on.
Mini case study
Suppose we are on a purple-team exercise for an Indian mid-size company (sample data). Red notes a technique from this lesson against a lab clone. Blue must show the control that stops it, the log that would have fired, and the ticket that hardens production. That is the standard this course trains you for.
Defender's worksheet (do this today)
- Write the lesson title, date and the exact lab target you are allowed to use.
- List three owned systems (VMs, apps, or cloud accounts) where this lesson applies.
- Run one safe check from the lesson on a lab system only. Paste the command and output.
- Write a two-sentence fix you would give a teammate.
- Name one related public advisory (CERT-In, CISA, NVD, or a vendor bulletin) with its date.
Indian workplace (sample data)
Suppose we are a junior analyst at Infosys, TCS, Wipro or a fintech SOC in Bengaluru/Pune. Turn this lesson into one checklist item with an owner, a due date and a place to store evidence (ticket + screenshot).
Global practice
Compare your notes with OWASP, CIS Benchmarks, NIST CSF/IR guidance or a cloud Well-Architected security question. Write five lines on what overlaps.
Everyday analogy
Explain the risk and the fix to a family member without jargon. If they can repeat the warning, you understand it well enough to teach juniors.
Key terms
- Control: a safeguard (patch, config, process, detection).
- Finding: a weakness backed by evidence.
- Remediation: the fix plus how you verified it.
- Scope: systems you have written permission to touch.
- Least privilege: only the access the task needs.
- Defence in depth: several layers so one failure does not end the story.
Common mistakes
- Skipping written permission "just for a quick scan".
- Practising on hostel, office or public targets without authorisation.
- Collecting tool output without writing the fix.
- Copying attack steps onto production to "verify". Defenders verify with versions, configs and patches.
- Publishing screenshots that contain secrets, cookies or internal hostnames.
Recap
- Evidence, fix, owner, date.
- Own lab only.
- Fix > spectacle.