24. Traffic Sniffing and Analysis
24.4 Display Filters and Following a Stream
Wireshark che display filters (capture filters peksha vegle) je disat aahe tyatun nemka packet shodhtat.
| Filter | Shows |
|---|---|
ip.addr == 192.168.56.20 |
Any packet to or from that IP |
tcp.port == 80 |
HTTP traffic |
http |
Only HTTP packets |
http.request.method == "POST" |
Form submissions (logins!) |
dns |
DNS queries and answers |
tcp.flags.syn == 1 && tcp.flags.ack == 0 |
Connection starts (spot a port scan) |
frame contains "password" |
Any packet with that word |
Follow TCP Stream: right-click a packet, Follow, TCP Stream, and Wireshark reassembles the whole conversation into readable text – the entire HTTP request and response in one window.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip
A capture filter and a display filter are different: a capture filter (tcpdump-style, port 80) is applied before capturing and takes in fewer packets; a display filter (http, ip.addr==) filters what is shown after capturing. Interviewers ask about this difference. At first, capture everything, then search with a display filter.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – मराठी
Capture filter आणि display filter वेगळे आहेत: capture filter (tcpdump-style,port 80) capture आधी लावला जातो आणि कमी packets घेतो; display filter (http, ip.addr==) capture नंतर दिसणारे packets गाळतो. Interview मध्ये हा फरक विचारतात. सुरुवातीला सगळे capture करा, मग display filter ने शोधा.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – हिंदी
Capture filter और display filter अलग हैं: capture filter (tcpdump-style,port 80) capture से पहले लगता है और कम packets लेता है; display filter (http, ip.addr==) capture के बाद दिखने वाले packets छाँटता है. Interview में यह फ़र्क पूछते हैं. शुरुआत में सब capture करो, फिर display filter से ढूँढो.
Lab
In Wireshark, apply http.request.method == "POST", then log in to DVWA (HTTP) from Firefox. Find the login POST, right-click, Follow TCP Stream, and read the request. You will see the username and password in plain text – proof for the next section.
Extended teaching notes
Why this lesson matters
Use this lesson to strengthen systems you own: understand the risk, practise safely in a lab, then write and apply the fix.
Apply the fix across stacks
Same class of bug, same idea in every language.
Java / Spring Boot
Parameterise queries, encode output, CSRF tokens, limited Actuator, dependency scanning.
ASP.NET Core
EF Core / parameterised SQL, Razor encoding, HTTPS, Data Protection.
Node.js / Express
helmet, parameterised SQL, npm audit, avoid eval and shell concat.
Python / Django / Flask / FastAPI
ORM, autoescape, pip-audit, Bandit; never shell=True with user input.
PHP / Laravel
PDO/Eloquent, Blade escaping, composer audit.
Go / Ruby
database/sql placeholders / ActiveRecord; html/template / ERB escaping; govulncheck / Brakeman.
nginx / Apache / Tomcat
Hide versions, TLS, security headers, least-open ports.
MySQL / PostgreSQL / MongoDB / Redis
Private networks, auth on, least-privilege users, no 0.0.0.0/0.
AWS / Azure / GCP
Roles not long-lived keys, private data stores, cloud audit logs on.
Mini case study
Suppose we are on a purple-team exercise for an Indian mid-size company (sample data). Red notes a technique from this lesson against a lab clone. Blue must show the control that stops it, the log that would have fired, and the ticket that hardens production. That is the standard this course trains you for.
Defender's worksheet (do this today)
- Write the lesson title, date and the exact lab target you are allowed to use.
- List three owned systems (VMs, apps, or cloud accounts) where this lesson applies.
- Run one safe check from the lesson on a lab system only. Paste the command and output.
- Write a two-sentence fix you would give a teammate.
- Name one related public advisory (CERT-In, CISA, NVD, or a vendor bulletin) with its date.
Indian workplace (sample data)
Suppose we are a junior analyst at Infosys, TCS, Wipro or a fintech SOC in Bengaluru/Pune. Turn this lesson into one checklist item with an owner, a due date and a place to store evidence (ticket + screenshot).
Global practice
Compare your notes with OWASP, CIS Benchmarks, NIST CSF/IR guidance or a cloud Well-Architected security question. Write five lines on what overlaps.
Everyday analogy
Explain the risk and the fix to a family member without jargon. If they can repeat the warning, you understand it well enough to teach juniors.
Key terms
- Control: a safeguard (patch, config, process, detection).
- Finding: a weakness backed by evidence.
- Remediation: the fix plus how you verified it.
- Scope: systems you have written permission to touch.
- Least privilege: only the access the task needs.
- Defence in depth: several layers so one failure does not end the story.
Common mistakes
- Skipping written permission "just for a quick scan".
- Practising on hostel, office or public targets without authorisation.
- Collecting tool output without writing the fix.
- Copying attack steps onto production to "verify". Defenders verify with versions, configs and patches.
- Publishing screenshots that contain secrets, cookies or internal hostnames.
Recap
- Evidence, fix, owner, date.
- Own lab only.
- Fix > spectacle.