6.1 Searching Text: grep
grep pattern match karnaarya lines dakhavto. Logs madhe attack shodhayla ha sarvaat jast vaparla jaanara command aahe.
| Option | Meaning |
|---|---|
-i |
Ignore case |
-r / -R |
Recursive search in directories |
-n |
Show line numbers |
-v |
Invert (lines that do NOT match) |
-c |
Count matching lines |
-l |
Only file names |
-w |
Match whole word |
-E |
Extended regex (alternation with a pipe symbol, +, ?) |
-A 3 / -B 3 / -C 3 |
Show 3 lines after / before / around |
grep -i "error" /var/log/nginx/error.log
grep -rn "listen" /etc/nginx/
grep -v "^#" /etc/ssh/sshd_config | grep -v "^$" # hide comments & blank lines
grep -c " 404 " /var/log/nginx/access.log # how many 404s?
grep -E "Failed|Invalid" /var/log/auth.log # Ubuntu SSH failures
sudo grep "Failed password" /var/log/secure # AL2/CentOS (AL2023 uses journalctl)
Why this matters for security
grep "Failed password" on the auth log shows SSH brute-force attempts; grep -E "union|select|<script" access.log finds SQL injection and XSS attempts in web logs. Many SIEM searches are just smarter versions of grep.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip
Many students write grep error and miss "Error" or "ERROR". The case changes in logs – use -i. And if you want to hide the comments in a config and see only the active lines, remember the trick grep -v "^#".
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – मराठी
बरेच students grep error लिहितात आणि "Error" किंवा "ERROR" miss करतात. Logs मध्ये case बदलतो – -i वापरा. आणि config मधल्या comments काढून फक्त active lines बघायच्या असतील तर grep -v "^#" ही trick लक्षात ठेवा.
Ravindra Bagale's Tip – हिंदी
बहुत से students grep error लिखते हैं और "Error" या "ERROR" छूट जाते हैं. Logs में case बदलता है – -i इस्तेमाल करो. और config के comments हटाकर सिर्फ़ active lines देखनी हों तो grep -v "^#" वाली trick याद रखो.
Practice task
On your server, count failed SSH logins, list all listen lines under /etc/nginx (after Part 3), and show sshd_config without comments and blank lines.
Extended teaching notes
Why this lesson matters
Use this lesson to strengthen systems you own: understand the risk, practise safely in a lab, then write and apply the fix.
Apply the fix across stacks
Same class of bug, same idea in every language.
Java / Spring Boot
Parameterise queries, encode output, CSRF tokens, limited Actuator, dependency scanning.
ASP.NET Core
EF Core / parameterised SQL, Razor encoding, HTTPS, Data Protection.
Node.js / Express
helmet, parameterised SQL, npm audit, avoid eval and shell concat.
Python / Django / Flask / FastAPI
ORM, autoescape, pip-audit, Bandit; never shell=True with user input.
PHP / Laravel
PDO/Eloquent, Blade escaping, composer audit.
Go / Ruby
database/sql placeholders / ActiveRecord; html/template / ERB escaping; govulncheck / Brakeman.
nginx / Apache / Tomcat
Hide versions, TLS, security headers, least-open ports.
MySQL / PostgreSQL / MongoDB / Redis
Private networks, auth on, least-privilege users, no 0.0.0.0/0.
AWS / Azure / GCP
Roles not long-lived keys, private data stores, cloud audit logs on.
Mini case study
Suppose we are on a purple-team exercise for an Indian mid-size company (sample data). Red notes a technique from this lesson against a lab clone. Blue must show the control that stops it, the log that would have fired, and the ticket that hardens production. That is the standard this course trains you for.
Defender's worksheet (do this today)
- Write the lesson title, date and the exact lab target you are allowed to use.
- List three owned systems (VMs, apps, or cloud accounts) where this lesson applies.
- Run one safe check from the lesson on a lab system only. Paste the command and output.
- Write a two-sentence fix you would give a teammate.
- Name one related public advisory (CERT-In, CISA, NVD, or a vendor bulletin) with its date.
Indian workplace (sample data)
Suppose we are a junior analyst at Infosys, TCS, Wipro or a fintech SOC in Bengaluru/Pune. Turn this lesson into one checklist item with an owner, a due date and a place to store evidence (ticket + screenshot).
Global practice
Compare your notes with OWASP, CIS Benchmarks, NIST CSF/IR guidance or a cloud Well-Architected security question. Write five lines on what overlaps.
Everyday analogy
Explain the risk and the fix to a family member without jargon. If they can repeat the warning, you understand it well enough to teach juniors.
Key terms
- Control: a safeguard (patch, config, process, detection).
- Finding: a weakness backed by evidence.
- Remediation: the fix plus how you verified it.
- Scope: systems you have written permission to touch.
- Least privilege: only the access the task needs.
- Defence in depth: several layers so one failure does not end the story.
Common mistakes
- Skipping written permission "just for a quick scan".
- Practising on hostel, office or public targets without authorisation.
- Collecting tool output without writing the fix.
- Copying attack steps onto production to "verify". Defenders verify with versions, configs and patches.
- Publishing screenshots that contain secrets, cookies or internal hostnames.
Recap
- Evidence, fix, owner, date.
- Own lab only.
- Fix > spectacle.